Returns Home to Orange County for Saturday Rally

May 11, 2012, Newport Beach, CA – Fresh from winning the Vice Presidential nomination at the Libertarian Party annual convention last weekend in Las Vegas, Newport Beach Judge Jim Gray returns home to begin his campaign for office with Presidential nominee Gov. Gary Johnson.

The Judge Gray Homecoming will be held on Saturday at 10 a.m. on the lawn of the historic Bowers Museum in Santa Ana, CA. For more information on the event, call 619.916-1249. A Question and Answer session will be held immediately following Gray’s address.
“I am proud. I am invigorated. I am excited. With Gov. Gary Johnson, I am determined to bring back prosperity and liberty to the United States of America.” Judge Gray said. “And, I am so grateful to all my friends, family and colleagues who have had a hand in this effort. And this was truly a team effort. It’s great to be home, but it probably won’t be for long,” he said smiling.
Judge Gray was declared the party’s Vice Presidential nominee after he won 59 percent of the vote, receiving 357 votes from the 600 delegates of the convention held at the Red Rock Resort in Las Vegas, Nev.

A successful jurist who lives in Newport Beach, Calif. and presided over the Superior Court of Orange County, Judge Gray has been active in the Libertarian Party for several decades.
He was the 2004 Libertarian Party candidate for the U.S. Senate in California challenging incumbent U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer. He is also the chief proponent of a California ballot initiative called “Regulate Marijuana Like Wine” that, if passed, would decriminalize cannabis consumption and production.
As the Libertarian nominees, the Johnson/Gray ticket is expected to be on the ballot in all 50 states.

Accepting the nomination, Johnson said, “Millions of Americans want and deserve the opportunity to vote for a candidate in November who will get us out of the war in Afghanistan immediately, truly cut federal spending, end the failed war on drugs, repeal the Patriot Act, and support marriage equality. I am excited to offer that option: A proven fiscal conservative, a proven defender of civil liberties, and an advocate for social tolerance.”

For more information regarding Judge Gray, go to his Web site at www.JudgeJimGray.com. To schedule interviews or for media inquiries, please contact Joe Hunter at media@garyjohnson2012.com, or at 801.303.7924.

California’s redevelopment agencies have received a death blow…for now…thanks to the California Supreme Court’s December 29 ruling. But government’s appetite for your money and private property remains insatiable. A 66-year habit is hard to break.

After World War II ended in 1945, the Legislature permitted cities and counties to establish special agencies to revitalize their blighted areas. Since that time, roughly 425 community redevelopment agencies (RDAs) have been dedicated to spending your property tax dollars on government-subsided housing, commercial development, eminent domain acquisitions and other land use and construction projects—as they deem necessary in the name of urban renewal.

But in January 2011, Governor Jerry Brown decided that the $1.7 billion in property taxes going to the agencies this year, about 12% of total statewide property taxes, would be better spent on helping to close California’s projected two-year, $25 billion budget shortfall. Besides, he concluded, the redevelopment agencies had developed the bad habit of misusing the funds! Monies supposed to be used to build affordable housing and, he’d hoped, to go to schools and public safety, were sometimes spent on private developers, golf course upgrades, extravagant dinners and apparel, and even lobbyist fees.

So in June, Brown and the Legislature decided on a compromise: the RDAs  would be dissolved (Assembly Bill 1X26) and municipalities would be permitted to join a voluntary redevelopment program by making payments annually to the state, to be used for schools and other services (AB 1X27). One month later, a petition was filed with the California Supreme Court by the California Redevelopment Association, the League of California Cities and the Northern California cities of San Jose and Union City, asking the Court to declare the elimination of redevelopment agencies unconstitutional.

Meanwhile, some municipalities made plans to go along with the compromise, though they weren’t happy about it. In Ventura County’s City of Thousand Oaks, some council members who voted to make the payment of $5.9 million to the state in the current fiscal year and an annual $1.4 million thereafter, to be part of the voluntary program, called the payments “ransom money” and “extortion.” They were angry that the state would take the city’s funds and redirect them to programs the state chose, rather than leave them to local discretion. Yet Thousand Oaks had its own issues with what many have called a misuse of redevelopment dollars: a private developer had received a lucrative deal from the city to develop an upscale shopping center, which included the RDA purchasing the land, paving sidewalks, paying developer fees and charging $1 per year for the land lease.

Other cities and counties were disgruntled with the governor’s legislation as well. They perceived a major source of their power being taken away, as RDAs provided them with funds (“property tax increments”) and authority to build low-income housing complexes, establish and renovate so-called “blighted” properties (a designation typically influenced by special interests), award loans and grants to businesses, establish public works projects and acquire property (via eminent domain), all purportedly to “create jobs” and “rebuild communities.”

The Supreme Court ruling alas came in on December 29, 2011. Accordingly, the State of California is on sound legal footing to eliminate redevelopment agencies. It may not, however, require payments be made to the state as part of a voluntary redevelopment program (where the state would redirect the funds to local services) because such a mandate would not be voluntary.

Some California taxpayers and private property rights groups are applauding the Supreme Court’s ruling as a triumph. Municipalities across the state are displeased, of course. They want the control of your tax dollars and property rights in their hands, not the state’s. For now, the 425 RDAs appear to be pushing up daisies; however, the root of the problem still exists. By its own hubris, your local government considers itself the authority on how to spend your money, utilize your land, rejuvenate your community, create jobs and grow the economy.

But you know those are not the proper, or even feasible, roles of government. You know that only you and your neighbors, individuals and businesses, operating in a private and free-choice marketplace can make the decisions that will truly safeguard your prosperity and quality of life. You know that when government taxes and spends according to its own priorities, the result is crony capitalism.

Right now our local officials are working on a “solution” to regain their power. Their central planning scheme has only been derailed temporarily. The message we must send them is NO to redevelopment agencies, NO to tax-and-spend economics and YES to stepping out of the way to allow private decisions to be made by individuals and businesses on how to grow their personal and commercial economies.

It’s time to overhaul our local governments. And it can’t be left up to the tried-and-untrue left and right wings of the Big Government Party. Real and lasting change must come from those who understand LIBERTY and are willing to fight for it. Libertarians are ready to do just that. With your help, the CALIFORNIA LIBERTARIAN PARTY will take the critical steps to revive our State as a place of freedom and prosperity. We urge you to come forward and JOIN US today!

Come to the Libertarian Leadership Seminar and learn what you can do to help further the growing liberty movement in California.

As each year goes by, the current crop of elected representatives in California find fewer and fewer ways to kick the can down the road. They continually apply old “solutions” that continually make things worse. Libertarian solutions must surface soon.

Every Libertarian in California must take action now!

The Libertarian Party of California is 100% percent committed to you and to the success of the Liberty movement. We’re presenting a Leadership Seminar with nine incredible speakers who will help you to learn how to accelerate the growth of the Libertarian Party in your community.

At the Leadership Seminar you will learn:

  • Power of persuasion on how to convince anyone to become a Libertarian
  • The confidence to approach anyone and start a conversation
  • How to talk about Libertarianism in a non-threatening way
  • How to motivate current Libertarians to actively spread the message of Liberty
  • How to attract more people to your meetings and bring them back every week
  • How to resolve conflicts and repair relationships
  • How to become an influential member of your community

Plus much more…

You want to join us at the Libertarian Leadership Seminar on Oct 8th 2011 in Sacramento because you are committed to the Libertarian Party and the Liberty movement. Your efforts will make a huge difference in improving and growing the Libertarian Party. With Proposition 14′s Top Two Balloting in effect in California, we all agree that something unprecedented is necessary to create positive change. If we continue to do only what we have always done, we will continue to receive the same results.

So make a commitment to improve California and go towww.LibertarianLeadership.org to register for the Libertarian Leadership Seminar. Early Bird Discount admission is $149 for single admission, or $199 for two. The discount ends Friday, September 30th, so reserve your admission now! Lunch and dinner are included with your seminar registration.

 

Reprinted with permission from the Ventura County Taxpayers Association

The State’s Senate Governance and Finance Committee has approved legislation authorizing counties and school districts to impose personal income taxes, local-level vehicle taxes, and a broad array of excise taxes, and to increase sales taxes in excess of the existing limits (SB 653, Steinberg).

CalTax Vice President of State Tax Policy Gina Rodriquez led the testimony against the bill, saying it would result in a fragmented system of taxation in the state, and could lead to Californians facing four different layers of personal income taxes.

The committee’s 6-2 approval was disappointing but expected, given the composition of the committee and the fact that a bill carried by the Senate President Pro Tem rarely goes down to defeat in its first committee hearing. The bill now moves to the Senate Appropriations Committee. This will be a majority vote bill if it reaches the floor.

This legislation also may become part of the budget negotiations, which should heat up after Governor Jerry Brown releases his May Revision in the middle of this month.

Taxpayers are urged to contact their legislators and let them know of your opposition. VCTA has already taken a position opposing this bill.

Contact your State Senator and let them know that you strongly oppose SB 653. This is not time to create additional burdens on taxpayers or the State’s economy. Click Here for more information about SB 653 and contact your Senator here.

1.) The Board should not accept the guidelines as recommended by staff as they added 29 pages of new language and only gave VC COLAB 2 days to respond to it.

2.) These guidelines, as written, will make County Public works programs more expensive and place an unnecessary burden on Taxpayers by increasing the need for higher taxes to pay for these new costs. The County should be looking for ways to save money not take on new costs.

3.) The guidelines, as written, will cost the County jobs as more private projects that are necessary for businesses to expand and hire workers will not be economically feasible. In fact, more businesses will leave the County and jobs will be lost. You cannot say you are for bringing back jobs and vote for these guidelines.

4.) The guidelines were created by selectively receiving the input of local biologists rather than taking into consideration the input of all the biologists who met with County Planning.

5.) These guidelines referring to “Locally Important Species” go too far! They even restrict species that are not endangered, rare, uncommon or unique. This will raise the cost of reporting, mitigating and creating environmental documents for EVERY discretionary project with native vegetation in the County to accommodate common species.
(Think fire prevention!  Are you willing to let your house burn down to protect a common onion?) This language in the document is entirely unnecessary and unwarranted and has NO APPARENT GAIN even for County Planning.

6-a.) You cannot say you are for “preserving agriculture” if you adopt these regulations because the South Coast Missing Linkages project considers agriculture a barrier to wildlife movement, calling for farming to be restricted. Fully 26,000 acres of farmland in Ventura County touches these Wildlife Corridors!!!

6-b.) These guidelines threaten county agriculture because new food safety laws requiring no animal droppings in agricultural fields and orchards will eventually require fencing which will render the specific routes proposed by the linkage studies infeasible. Will farming have to halt in order to comply with both requirements of these proposed guidelines and existing food safety laws? Whether farmers put up fencing or not, either way, they would be in conflict with regulations somewhere if they were to continue farming.

7.) While protecting wetlands is an agreeable endeavor, the guidelines, as written, would create a moratorium on all county projects that impact waters and wetlands because the County has yet to setup a program for mitigating or restoring such wetlands.

8.) These guidelines will hurt low-income families and minorities because a large percentage of these groups rely on agriculture for their income and jobs in Ventura County. These guidelines would reduce agricultural activity and the need for labor due to unnecessary restrictions.

9.) County Planners and Save Open-Space & Agricultural Resources (S.O.A.R.) claim these regulations are necessary to “protect” farming and prevent urban sprawl, but they do just the opposite. Preventing farmers from building structures such as barns, storage sheds, and other facilities (with hyper-restrictive regulations) isn’t the “urban sprawl” most people are trying to avoid. They are necessary investments to produce the food we all eat.

10.) The definition of a wetland is so all-encompassing that common landscape features such as culverts can potentially be defined as wetlands. And what farm doesn’t have a culvert next to it’s fields?

11.) The guidelines are based on studies, some of which the public has not been allowed access to the underlying data or methodologies. It is irresponsible for the County Board of Supervisors to adopt new regulations where the public has not had a chance to verify whether the science is sound or not. Think Climate-gate scandal

12.) As a twelfth bonus reason, these guidelines are an affront to private property rights protected under the United State Constitution. Government is going too far.

“Key to sound environmental policy is respect for private property rights” -Ron Paul

© 2010 Libertarian Party of Ventura County Ventura County Libertarian Party P.O. Box 2417 Camarillo, CA 93011 Phone: (805) 652-0290 Email: lpventura.co@gmail.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 200 access attempts in the last 7 days.